What is Money and Why the Rich Don’t Hoard it

I have heard more than once that the reason we should not lower taxes on the rich (who they define as ‘rich’, I have no idea) because the rich will just hoard the money.  I’ve even heard it from people who I generally consider to be pretty smart.  Of course, whenever I press them for more information I hear things like, “it’s a proven fact, rich people will hoard money and poor people will spend it”.  I then ask how it was proven and the response undoubtedly is, “It just is”.  Eventually the conversation nose dives and I’m called racist because I think everyone should pay less taxes.  It might sound crazy, but it is true, I’ve been called racist for saying everyone should pay less tax.  I wonder if there is an email that goes out with daily talking points? If there is, I’m sure the first line always says, “Question nothing you read here. Accept everything as fact.  Repeat all lines as often as possible.  If this fails, call your opponent a racist, sexist, bigot, etc.”  Anyway, the purpose of this post is to try to get you to think a little bit differently about what money is and understand why it makes no sense at all for the rich to hoard money.

I am going to try to keep this short and just brush the surface of the concept of money.  There have been literally thousands of books have been written about money.  A search of “The History of Money” on amazon.com gave me 15,307 results.

Money has affected our whole lives.  Most people, at some point in their lives, dream of what it would be like to have a million dollars.  What is a million dollars? What is a dollar?  Would it surprise you if I told you that you do not go to work for money?  Did you know when you swipe your credit card you are not actually borrowing money?  A dollar is essentially useless on its own.  If you took a suitcase full of a million dollars to an uninhabited remote island, you would be dirt poor.  I guess the dollars could be used as a note pad, or wallpaper for a hut you might build on the island, but really, a dollar isn’t very valuable as a physical piece of paper/cotton, or whatever dollar bills are made out of.  The reason a dollar has any value at all is because we are confident that we can exchange that dollar for some good or service.  If we lost that confidence, we would no longer collect a pay check in dollar bills.

Right now, I’m talking about a fiat currency, but it applies to gold as well. I have no idea what gold is used for other than jewelry, but I know if I was digging in my back yard and for a chunk of gold and a chunk of granite, I’d take the gold and leave the granite.  Why? Because I am very confident I can exchange the gold for stuff.  While there probably is a market for a small piece of granite, I have no idea where I could exchange granite for anything of value.  It would probably not be worth my time to exchange it anyway.

So, if we do not work for dollars, what do we work for?  The answer is simple, we work for stuff! Stuff can be anything.  Food, clothes, shelter, transportation, leisure, hobbies, etc are all examples of the stuff we work for.  Dollars simply represent the value we created at our jobs, and give us purchasing power.

There was a time way back in history that people bartered for good without money.  If I grew potatoes and you grew cabbage, I would have to trade my potatoes if I wanted your cabbage (assuming you wanted potatoes).  I would have paid my employees in potatoes, so they could trade for what they wanted or needed.  This became tough when I needed meat, but the person with the pig wanted cabbage.  I’d have to trade you for your cabbage then go to the pig guy with the cabbage to get his meat.  This was extremely inefficient and gave rise to commodity based currency.

You see this played out by children on Halloween every year.  I remember when I was young, and I see it in kids today.  When my friends and I were done trick-or-treating we would dump our bags full of candy onto the living room floor and begin trading.  Single Reese’s Cups were a hot commodity and usually ended up being our currency, even if we didn’t consciously know what we were doing.  I would trade 3 Reese’s Cups for a regular sized snickers.  When I was down to my last Reese’s Cup, I’d have to trade my 4 fun sized Milky Ways for 2 Reese’s Cups so that I could trade my Reese’s Cups for the Snickers bar.  Essentially, a Reese’s Cup was the base currency, we’ll call it a dollar.  Fun Size Milky Ways became a half-dollar and a snickers bar was $3…Reese’s Cups represented our purchasing power.

I understand that example isn’t exactly apples to apples, but you could say that the kids who worked harder, i.e. went to more houses, created more wealth and therefore had more purchasing power.  The point is that instead of your employer paying you in food, clothes, shelter, transportation, etc, it is a lot more efficient to pay in dollars and have you choose what you want to work for instead of your employer choosing for you.

So back to the original point of the so-called “rich” hoarding their money.  To me, hoarding means something like storing cash in your closet, under your mattress, or burying it in your backyard.  It makes no sense. Money is useless unless it is spent on stuff. The homeless guy you pass on the subway could quite possibly have a million dollars in that bag he is carrying around.  However, he would be hoarding the money and therefore he has nothing at all.

If by hoarding money they mean keeping it in the bank, then they clearly have no idea at all what a bank does.  A bank does not put your money in a vault, water it, then pay you interest from the additional money that grows.  Banks invest that money in other business and individuals so that they can create more wealth.  The business or individual that borrowed the money, actually borrows the stuff they bought with that money, whether it is a store or a house or a car.  They pay the money back, plus interest, overtime by creating goods or services equal in value, plus interest, of the stuff they originally borrowed.

If they truly did hoard money, they would be getting poorer every day due to inflation and our government printing more dollars. Have you ever heard your father tell you he used to get a candy bar for a nickel?  Printing dollars increases the supply of dollars and therefore lowers the wealth required (quantity demanded) for a dollar and therefore taxes you value out of the dollar you own…but that is a topic for a different post.

I hope I made my point and I welcome any comments or criticisms, but remember, the rich hoarding money is a myth!

God Bless Freedom, Liberty, and Personal Property,

Slappy Jones II

Tagged: , ,


'What is Money and Why the Rich Don’t Hoard it' have 10 comments

  1. November 28, 2012 @ 5:17 am Steve

    Currency is also a means of leveling the playing field for different industries. For instance, if a fisherman wanted to do business with a shoe salesman, the fisherman would be at a disadvantage. Since dead fish will rot fairly quickly, the shoe salesman could afford to wait out the fisherman. Therefore, the fisherman would be forced into an unfair exchange simply to avoid losing the fruits of his labor to spoilage. Having currency removes this obstacle. It allows the fisherman to exchange his fish for money which he can use at a later time when the fish are long gone.

    As for “hoarding money,” this is a ridiculous notion. America is notorious for having first generation wealthy people. That means individuals earned their money instead of inheriting it. Therefore it’s pretty logical to assume these people are good at investing their wealth and making it grow. Somehow it’s ok when the president wants to “invest” in roads and bridges (i.e.- expand government) but it’s evil for an individual to invest his own hard-earned money in a business, bank, or consumer good. Bottom line, you are dead-on about this hoarding myth. Thank God for wealthy people. They are the ones signing our paychecks and the true engines of the American economy.


  2. December 11, 2012 @ 12:31 am The Estate Tax | Inside McFloogle's Mind

    [...] even show up to work to turn in a resignation letter?  But why is that a bad thing? As I explained here money represents created wealth and has no value unless it is spent.  The people who inherit a [...]


  3. August 8, 2013 @ 3:47 am Montana Mom

    I believe that dollars are a limited resource, as there are only so many of them. They flow through the economy like water through the water cycle. It rains a little on us little folks in the headwaters, and runs through our fingers as it gathers in streams and rivers and eventually the ocean, the some 26 trillion or so that are now hoarded (sorry, “saved responsibly” as one commenter put it, or invested by a bank as you say, or whatever their savings are doing when they supposedly save 37% of their income). Upstream, we build little dams and diversions to keep some of it for use later, or to pass on to our kids, through jobs, businesses, savings, any way we can bring a little of the stream our way. But most of it pours on downstream to be used by others, and eventually ends up in the ocean. Unless that is reinvested upstream, or taxed and spent upstream, we all are soon living in a cash desert. The ocean right now seems to be covered with a big plastic tarp, and so very little can evaporate and rain on the rest of us.

    Whether taxing the rich is fair or not, it is the only incentive to get them to invest it in us upstream folks – invest or pay taxes, either way, that’s the only way to get cash back into our economy (besides printing more, and we all know where that leads). Now if we all agreed to use something besides dollars to measure value and trade, like, say, human hours or something, we might be able to green up this desert ourselves, but as long as we all agree to base our economy on using dollars, then we have to have some raining and flowing or we’re going to dry up and blow away. Feel parched? Now you know why. Well, actually, I doubt many of the “parched” are reading this blog anyway.


    • August 9, 2013 @ 12:47 am Rollo McFloogle

      Dollars really aren’t a limited resource. Theoretically, you can print as many of them as you want, which is what the federal government is doing, which is ruining the purchasing power of the middle and lower classes.

      “but as long as we all agree to base our economy on using dollars, then we have to have some raining and flowing or we’re going to dry up and blow away”

      We didn’t agree to use dollars to judge our economy. That was chosen for us by the government. It’s illegal to use any other currency. But anyway, the dollar is only a convenient means of exchange and a quantitative tool. The best way to measure an economy is to explore people’s change in utility, but unfortunately, you can’t measure that. The only way you can truly judge the economic health of a society is to ask each individual whether or not they are better off today than they were yesterday. If the answer is yes (and this needs to be a truly honest answer), you’re moving in the correct direction.

      And you can’t answer that question relative to the movement of anyone else. Say you make $40,000 and have $100,000 in assets, and are given a raise of $10,000 a year. At the same time, a person with $100,000,000 in assets is given a raise of $1,000,000 a year. The rich guy is far outpacing you in the accumulation of wealth, but the impact of your raise is likely more important than his. Yet according to today’s standards of judgement, he’s the winner and you’re the loser–but you’re clearly doing better.

      Another way to put it is that in a truly free market, all transactions are voluntary. And since no rational person will intentionally try to do damage to themselves or their economic standing, the only way someone engages in a transaction is if they believe they are making their life better. If you believed the transaction you were about to make was going to harm you (or at least not put you in a better position than you are now), would you do it? I don’t think so.

      If you’ve made it this far reading, I can condense it down to a few words: Don’t worry about other people when judging your own lot in life.


  4. October 15, 2013 @ 6:03 pm Katherine

    They invest it surely?I keep mine under the bed.Only,I have no bed…


    • October 15, 2013 @ 11:05 pm slappyjones2

      No bed, but a computer with internet access. If you can afford the computer and the monthly cost of intenet, maybe you should save a few bucks for a bed to hoard your money! Thanks again, you’re 2 for 2 today!


  5. October 16, 2013 @ 3:52 pm Katherine

    I sleep on a rug with my cat Jake


    • October 16, 2013 @ 7:37 pm slappyjones2

      Well you’re lucky the cat can’t get under the rug you sleep on. You could hoard all kinds of money there! My cat, Xena, constantly hides under my bed.


  6. October 26, 2013 @ 12:05 pm Catsgrace

    I must look under the rug..I found £2 on the floor..almost enough to buy a coffee!Those cats,they are so cunning.Why,I am sure they have their own credit cards nowadays with a paw print!!


  7. March 19, 2014 @ 11:13 pm Universal basic income defense by AlterNet.org’s Lynn Stuart Parramore misses some basic points | Inside McFloogle's Mind

    […] driver of the economy.  Furthermore, what is with this “ordinary” people qualification?  Do the rich simply hoard surpluses of money?  If it is true that more money being freely circulated to businesses is a good thing, then why not […]


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

Images are for demo purposes only and are properties of their respective owners. Old Paper by ThunderThemes.net

%d bloggers like this: